Positioning Marketing


Marketing is a fascinating field.  Ever since my close up exposure to early Citrix marketing, I’ve always wondered how these things really work.  There was always a taste of what it was, but never any really deep understanding.

Recently I searched for marketing related topics and found one that really interested me.  It is called positioning marketing and is used primarily to shift how consumers think about particular products or companies.

Surprisingly it is a fairly new field having been created in the late 1960s.  It probably needed something like television to really catapult the possibility of doing this kind of marketing.

Wikipedia has a brief description of positional marketing that is a good starting point.

In marketing, positioning has come to mean the process by which marketers try to create an image or identity in the minds of their target market for its product, brand, or organization. It is the ‘relative competitive comparison’ their product occupies in a given market as perceived by the target market.

Re-positioning involves changing the identity of a product, relative to the identity of competing products, in the collective minds of the target market.

De-positioning involves attempting to change the identity of competing products, relative to the identity of your own product, in the collective minds of the target market.

The original work on Positioning was consumer marketing oriented, and was not as much focused on the question relativity to competitive products as much as it was focused on cutting through the ambient “noise” and establishing a moment of real contact with the intended recipient. In the classic example of Avis claiming “No.2, We Try Harder”, the point was to say something so shocking (it was by the standards of the day) that it cleared space in your brain and made you forget all about who was #1, and not to make some philosophical point about being “hungry” for business.

The growth of high-tech marketing may have had much to do with the shift in definition towards competitive positioning.

Positioning is all about changing how you look at products and companies.  In many cases the products and companies do not change.  Rather, marketing is responsible for portraying the product or company in a different light to cause a mind shift in the consumer.

The most likely benefit comes from isolating the product/company away from the competition by providing something that the other companies cannot provide or as well.  Echoing the thinking of “Good to Great”, marketing is responsible for identifying the “Hedgehog” philosophy of how to sell the image most successfully.

Companies are constantly re-adjusting their image based on new opportunities or threats.  Most companies see this process as a sort of battle that occurs between new products or services.  Probably the most important realization is that the thoughts of the company/product become more important than the actual true benefit/performance provided.  Obviously loyalty will overlook a newcomer even if they are better.  Loyalty comes from thinking which comes from marketing image.

There are two people credited with popularizing the concept of positioning and their names are Al Ries and Jack Trout.  I went looking for more information on them and they have spent their lives refining this model and trying to convince companies how important this is.

Please watch this video from Jack Trout.  It summarize his exploration of marketing and strategies for business success through marketing.  It stresses that business needs to focus on marketing and innovation.  Marketing is seen as a differentiator from other companies.  This all makes sense once explained but someone like me does not find this kind of advice as being obvious.

Jack has a column on Forbes.com that covers different topics that he cares about.  As an example, please read “Differentiate or Die“.  Once you get a feeling for what he is saying, you can see the value of the advice.  His experience in the business has led him to form many conclusions that clash with popular marketing thinking in some companies.  He gives a good example with Coke being so focused on the “show business” angle of advertising and losing touch with differentiation.  Jack calls this a lack of focus.  He does have a point.

Perhaps I enjoyed this topic because it is so different from what I normally do.  Obviously I’m way behind the understanding of someone trained to do marketing from the field or school.  However, I do have a good sense for knowing which teachers to listen to and apply.  Jack Trout is certainly on my list now.

To summarize, positioning is used to convince customers of the relative value of something they can buy.  It essentially is the art and science of getting you to think a certain way about a thing that makes it different from everything else you know but yet be relative to what you know.  Said more simply, positioning is about putting the ideas in your head about what relative value the product or service has.  It can’t be the same as something else otherwise the consumer will most likely pick what they already know.  However, you can refer to the other product so that the consumer knows why they should pick you instead.  It sounds easy to explain but it is not.

The ultimate goal is to find the spot of your brain that does not have any current opinion and give it one.  The idea is that consumers don’t like mind conflict on the same topics and will better receive a new product when it comes with a new story.  Something radically new would be perceived as being too risky to try so that is why being relative to other products is so valuable.


Live near Brisbane, Australia. Software developer currently focused on iOS and Android. Avid Google Local Guide

Tagged with:
Posted in Marketing
8 comments on “Positioning Marketing
  1. c1tr1xguru says:


    great article. I would suggest taking a look at another book called “Blue Ocean Strategy”. It has some indirect impact on marketing, but it’s about the changing of a mindset that every company has….the lesson in futility that is head-to-head competition in search of sustained growth. Today’s competitive landscape is what the authors would call a “red ocean”, meaning that it’s where rivals are fighting over a shrinking pool of profitability. The authors, W. Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne point out that this is where most companies compete, but that this strategy is not a good breeding ground for long-term profitable growth. They point out that by moving to “blue oceans” of uncontested marketspace this will create remarkable leaps in value for the company and the customers of those companies, thereby making the competition irrelevant.

    I have seen a few companies in our industry try this just to fall short. It’s tough work without a framework from which to build. This book provides that framework.

    Take a peek, I’m sure you’ll like it.


  2. jeffreymuir says:


    Thanks. That’s good advice. It is a very important point to create new spaces instead of always fighting over old ones.

    I’ve added the book “Blue Ocean Strategy” to my list of books to get.

    I think Citrix did this when it was founded and for a number of years but has become more focused on competition in recent times.


  3. I am not so impressed with the Blue Ocean Strategy. Positioning is a much much better book.

    What I would recommend is “Trout on Strategy” by Jack Trout. A short and straight book by the Legend of positioning.

  4. jeffreymuir says:


    Thanks for the advice on “Trout on Strategy”. It’s always good to have a wide range of great books to read.

    Any other Trout books you would recommend?

  5. In fact, all Jack’s books are great. But “Trout on Strategy” summarizes all his thinking.

    If you are interested I encourage you to read my free e-book about business blogging “The New Rules of Business Blogs”. You can download it from my blog http://www.positioningstrategy.com.

    Please feel free to pass this book or link to whoever you think it can be useful.

  6. jeffreymuir says:

    I read your free book and thought it had helpful advice. It is easy to treat everything the same. The point that surprised me is that it isn’t always helpful to post frequently. This does make sense because it is harder to generate interesting content in a short period of time.


  7. […] Jack Trout is perhaps most famous for his views on positioning. […]

  8. David Hall says:

    Great input, I enjoyed reading this post. If you’re interested in Social Media, “Why now is the time to crush it! Cash in on your passion.” by Gary Vaynerchuk is a great book and very inspirational as well.

Comments are closed.

Follow Red Circle Blog on WordPress.com
%d bloggers like this: